Search for: All records

Increasing interest in the deployment of optical oxygen sensors, or optodes, on oceanographic moorings reflects the value of dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements in studies of physical and biogeochemical processes. Optodes are well-suited for moored applications but require careful, multi-step calibrations in the field to ensure data accuracy. Without a standardized set of protocols, this can be an obstacle for science teams lacking expertise in optode data processing and calibration. Here, we provide a set of recommendations for the deployment andin situcalibration of data from moored optodes, developed from our experience working with a set of 60 optodes deployed as part of the Gases in the Overturning and Horizontal circulation of the Subpolar North Atlantic Program (GOHSNAP). In particular, we detail the correction of drift in moored optodes, which occurs in two forms: (i) an irreversible, time-dependent drift that occurs during both optode storage and deployment and (ii) a reversible and pressure-and-time-dependent drift that is detectable in some optodes deployed at depths greater than 1,000 m. The latter is virtually unidentified in the literature yet appears to cause a low-bias in measured DO on the order of 1 to 3µmol kg⁻¹per 1,000 m of depth, appearing as an exponential decay over the first days to months of deployment. Comparisons of our calibrated DO time series against serendipitous mid-deployment conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD)-DO profiles, as well as biogeochemical (BGC)-ARGO float profiles, suggest the protocols described here yield an accuracy in optode-DO of ∼1%, or approximately 2.5 to 3µmol kg⁻¹. We intend this paper to serve as both documentation of the current best practices in the deployment of moored optodes as well as a guide for science teams seeking to collect high-quality moored oxygen data, regardless of expertise. 

As companies begin selling credits for marine carbon dioxide removal in largely unregulated marketplaces, scientists must develop standards for assessing the effectiveness of removal methods. 

Abstract. Monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) refers to the multistep process of monitoring the amount of greenhouse gas removed by a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) activity and reporting the results of the monitoring to a third party. The third party then verifies the reporting of the results. While MRV is usually conducted in pursuit of certification in a voluntary or regulated CDR market, this chapter focuses on key recommendations for MRV relevant to ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) research. Early stage MRV for OAE research may become the foundation on which markets are built. Therefore, such research carries a special obligation toward comprehensiveness, reproducibility, and transparency. Observational approaches during field trials should aim to quantify the delivery of alkalinity to seawater and monitor for secondary precipitation, biotic calcification, and other ecosystem changes that can feed back on sources or sinks of greenhouse gases where alkalinity is measurably elevated. Observations of resultant shifts in the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and ocean pH can help determine the efficacy of OAE and are amenable to autonomous monitoring. However, because the ocean is turbulent and energetic and CO2 equilibration between the ocean and atmosphere can take several months or longer, added alkalinity will be diluted to perturbation levels undetectable above background variability on timescales relevant for MRV. Therefore, comprehensive quantification of carbon removal via OAE will be impossible through observational methods alone, and numerical simulations will be required. The development of fit-for-purpose models, carefully validated against observational data, will be a critical part of MRV for OAE. 

Abstract The Eastern Tropical North Atlantic Oxygen Minimum Zone (OMZ) is a biogeochemically important area. The low oxygen in this region is thought to be maintained by a balance between the slow mixing supply of O₂and its removal by respiration. We use data from 90 isopycnal RAFOS floats to characterize the mixing coefficients responsible for the supply of oxygen to the region. One group was ballasted to drift on the isopycnal where oxygen is at its minimum and the other about 300 m deeper. Using the record of the float positions at each 6‐hr interval, we calculate the relative dispersion of pairs of floats. The time derivative of this dispersion provides a diffusivity coefficient that captures the net effect of eddy‐driven mixing along each isopycnal. Float pairs deployed at shared locations but across the two target densities reveal that the influence of vertically sheared currents is to accelerate the dispersion by 10–15% relative to true isopycnal dispersion. Relative dispersion of the floats in the OMZ area obeyed the canonical four‐thirds power scaling, representative of two‐dimensional turbulence. At the length scale of the maximum energy‐containing eddy (approximately 100 km), the effective diffusivity is 1,400±500 m²/s in the zonal direction and 800±300 m²/s in the meridional. Within the uncertainty, the diffusivities on the two isopycnals are indistinguishable from one another. An idealized model suggests that meridional mixing across the large‐scale O₂gradient is the leading supply term of oxygen to the OMZ.